|
|
By Zach Schiff  January 26, 2010, at 1:15 am  Did you really expect something different than what happened tonight?
Did you expect Donald Brashear to do more than Erik Christensen or Ales Kotalik would? Look at this stat-line: 5 shifts, 5 minutes 35 seconds, 2 hits, minus-1.
With (essentially) a 6-minute power play and Michal Rozsival running the point, what did you expect? A shot to hit the net? A goal?
Get real. With Kotalik watching from above and Mike Del Zotto playing the opposite side (so he can’t get a real shot off), there was nobody to blast the puck from the point. And with no Rangers wanting to stand in the crease, even if they did, there was nobody to bang home a rebound.
Kotalik sits during the “winning streak” against Montreal and Tampa Bay, so he sits again in Philadelphia. Okay, I see that. If it’s working, run with it. They lose, but he sits again in Montreal. Interesting, but I see what John Tortorella is doing. But now they’ve been shut out 2 straight games and their cannon-shot is still not dressed, while gutless players like Brashear and Chris Higgins get to go in.
At one point during the extended power plays in the 3rd period, all four Penguin penalty-killers and their goalie were facing the same direction – towards the corner so Marc-Andre Fleury had to turn his neck left to face the puck. Rozsival, for some unknown reason, was on the left point (maybe Wade Redden was changing his tampon, I don’t know, I’m not the bench boss).
Now, if this was a team playing the Rangers – say, Montreal, Philadelphia, or Pittsburgh – that point man would have skated down so that he was facing the penalty-killers’ backs. He would have received a pass and banged it home before Henrik Lundqvist had adequate time to slide back to the other post.
However, this is Mikey Rozsival we’re talking about. What did he do? Waited for a pass. Just to pass again. Just to have the puck fumbled out of the zone, thus killing any chance of a good play.
Apparently, the PK-men on Pittsburgh weren’t the only ones not paying attention on that play.
I’m not saying that Kotalik himself would’ve saved this game. But if he was out there shooting and someone wanted to get dirty in the crease – hey, Sean Avery can’t play every shift, can he? – then maybe a garbage goal would’ve gone in and all of you would be singing the praises of this team for coming back from a 1-0 deficit and finally winning at home.
But no one wants to shoot. No one wants to get dirty. No one wants to hit.
And I guess no one wants to play in May, either.
By Zach Schiff November 6, 2009, at 12:02 am I try not to be one of “those fans” – you know, the type who sulks and glooms and says the team is horrible after a loss, but they’re the first one to chant “We Want the Cup” after a convincing win.
However, tonight was a good game. The difference between Edmonton and Vancouver, between 1,160 kilometers or 721 miles (thank you, Google Maps), was the offense. It was firing tonight. They took advantage of power plays. (The 0% on the power play was misleading in Vancouver, by the way. Chris Higgins scored a second after one expired.) They swarmed the net. They passed well. But more importantly, they took shots. Take a shot, you never know what will happen.
They had 23 shots in Vancouver – 14 in the second period and then 9 combined in periods 1 and 3. Tonight, they had 39. Phil Esposito always says – and I’m sure Alex Ovechkin will concur – you can’t score if you don’t shoot. Dan Girardi had a great pass/shot today that Sean Avery deflected. It didn’t go in, but it was close. Get the puck to the net. If they don’t get the puck to the net, Marian Gaborik doesn’t one-hand that last goal home.
The effort was definitely there tonight…
Aaron Voros - Horrible 1st period, but he did play better in the 2nd and 3rd… saving his job for another day. Granted, he probably only had another 3 minutes all game, but they were better than his first minute, where he took 2 penalties. When he swung his stick at an Oilers’ knees (can’t remember which Oiler) and took a two-minute minor, did you see how *shocked* he was? How could he be surprised! It looked like he was cutting down a tree!
(By the way, I’ve never used the two asterisks on a word before in my life.)
Brian Boyle – Good ol’ T-Bone. How many open nets can a man miss in one period? The answer, it seems, is two… twice. But he had a few good shots, a couple of good hits, and played like a 4th line player should: Good enough for the coach not to be nervous to put you out on the ice.
Chris Higgins - I won’t profess him a great pickup yet, although we’re all happy he is here instead of Scott Gomez. However, isn’t it amazing how much better he is playing since he scored one goal? He has another goal already and played inspired, tough hockey tonight. If only he would do a move on a breakaway. Every time he gets one, he just shoots, and so far, it hasn’t worked.
Ryan Callahan – “Gritty.” Good word to describe his play tonight, as far as most nights.
Brandon Dubinsky – Was he even out there tonight? I noticed his play as much as I noticed Healthy Scratch Donald Brashear.
Wade Redden & Michal Rozsival – Weak games as well. Redden reminds me of myself, when I was 9. Any time I got the puck, I would get scared and pass it to the nearest teammate. That’s what he does. Don’t believe the hype in his “great pass to spring Higgins on a breakaway.” It was lucky, he was just clearing it. And Rozsival? For a defender, he sure doesn’t defend. I wouldn’t want him on my team during an autumnal game of capture the flag, let alone near my crease in an NHL game.
Steve Valiquette – The team played good in front of him – especially Girardi and Marc Staal. It was huge for him to win this game, especially after the Sharks game where he got shellacked. Now, like Boyle, John Tortorella should feel safe putting him into a game.
Now, let’s not be overly optimistic. Edmonton is a mediocre team. They were .500 going into tonight, and they were on a slide. Sheldon Souray is hurt, significantly impacting their power play. Mike Comrie was sick. A lot of other players got hit with the flu bug also the past 10 days.
So, what did the Rangers really do? They beat up on a weak team. And sometimes, that’s just what you need to get back on track. Now, let’s see if they can keep up the pace against the 9-4-1 Flames, who suddenly are an offensive team.
(By the way, I love these 9:30 games. I leave work at 8:20, clean up, eat, and I’m ready for pre-game and the opening faceoff.)
By Zach Schiff October 22, 2009, at 11:52 pm Not too much to say about tonight’s game that you won’t read elsewhere since I recorded the game since I was out and watched it quickly.
However, notice the difference in the two games between the Rangers and Devils this year, most notably in penalties and power plays.
Arguably, the two teams played basically the same in both games. Sure, maybe the Rangers weren’t as good tonight, but they both played the same style – fast-paced, slightly gritty, kind of dirty.
Yet, on Monday, October 5, 18 penalties were called in 3 periods. That does include some co-incidental minors that didn’t result in a power play (an Ales Kotalik hooking call with a Nicklas Bergfors diving penalty; Aaron Voros and David Clarkson both for roughing in the 3rd), but there were no fights. All 18 penalties were two-minute minors. Each team had 6 power play opportunities.
On Thursday, October 22, 6 penalties were called. Two were from the same fight, and there were only 4 two-minute minors called, and one of them was with 24 seconds left.
What was the difference, you ask? Was it John Tortorella showing the Rangers videos of their penalties so they don’t repeat the same mistake? Possibly, but how to account for the Devils only taking 3 minors as opposed to 9? I think there was another factor in play.
Dare I say it? The difference is the network that the games were played on. The first game (10/5) was on Versus, where they want to bring in new viewers. What do “fringe fans” want? By fringe fans, I mean, say, people who normally don’t watch hockey but turn it on from time to time; or people who have no rooting interest in one of the teams playing but are watching anyway; or people at a bar watching it because it’s on. Fringe fans want to see goals. More penalties = more power plays = more goals and exciting chances.
If Calgary is playing Columbus, I have no reason to watch a 1-0 game since I’m a Ranger fan and have no rooting interest in it. But if it’s 6-5, 4-3, or even 6-5, I’ll watch because it looks like an exciting game. Same for people who don’t ever really watch hockey – they won’t watch a 2-0 Devils shutout but they’ll watch a 3-2 Rangers win with back-and-forth action and breath-taking saves by both goalies.
Now, tonight’s game (or technically, last night’s game) was on MSG or MSG+. Odds are, if you’re tuning in to a Rangers/Devils game on MSG instead of the Yankee playoff game where they have a chance to win the pennant, you’re a big fan and will watch the game no matter what. If it’s 5-on-5 play the whole game, I’m still watching.
I constantly say how much I dislike the games on Versus, not only for their annoying broadcasts (although last year was much worse than this year) but for the facts that the referees constantly blow the whistle for phantom calls and bogus penalties.
If you don’t believe me, keep an eye out during the next Rangers game on Versus. That game is November 17 at MSG against Washington. Think the NHL doesn’t want Poster Boy Alex Ovechkin, Nik Backstrom, Mike Green, and Alex Semin to score 8 power play goals that night? That game might break the record for two-minute minors.
|
|
Tags: 
