|
|
By Zach Schiff  January 26, 2010, at 1:15 am  Did you really expect something different than what happened tonight?
Did you expect Donald Brashear to do more than Erik Christensen or Ales Kotalik would? Look at this stat-line: 5 shifts, 5 minutes 35 seconds, 2 hits, minus-1.
With (essentially) a 6-minute power play and Michal Rozsival running the point, what did you expect? A shot to hit the net? A goal?
Get real. With Kotalik watching from above and Mike Del Zotto playing the opposite side (so he can’t get a real shot off), there was nobody to blast the puck from the point. And with no Rangers wanting to stand in the crease, even if they did, there was nobody to bang home a rebound.
Kotalik sits during the “winning streak” against Montreal and Tampa Bay, so he sits again in Philadelphia. Okay, I see that. If it’s working, run with it. They lose, but he sits again in Montreal. Interesting, but I see what John Tortorella is doing. But now they’ve been shut out 2 straight games and their cannon-shot is still not dressed, while gutless players like Brashear and Chris Higgins get to go in.
At one point during the extended power plays in the 3rd period, all four Penguin penalty-killers and their goalie were facing the same direction – towards the corner so Marc-Andre Fleury had to turn his neck left to face the puck. Rozsival, for some unknown reason, was on the left point (maybe Wade Redden was changing his tampon, I don’t know, I’m not the bench boss).
Now, if this was a team playing the Rangers – say, Montreal, Philadelphia, or Pittsburgh – that point man would have skated down so that he was facing the penalty-killers’ backs. He would have received a pass and banged it home before Henrik Lundqvist had adequate time to slide back to the other post.
However, this is Mikey Rozsival we’re talking about. What did he do? Waited for a pass. Just to pass again. Just to have the puck fumbled out of the zone, thus killing any chance of a good play.
Apparently, the PK-men on Pittsburgh weren’t the only ones not paying attention on that play.
I’m not saying that Kotalik himself would’ve saved this game. But if he was out there shooting and someone wanted to get dirty in the crease – hey, Sean Avery can’t play every shift, can he? – then maybe a garbage goal would’ve gone in and all of you would be singing the praises of this team for coming back from a 1-0 deficit and finally winning at home.
But no one wants to shoot. No one wants to get dirty. No one wants to hit.
And I guess no one wants to play in May, either.
By Bryan Berg January 19, 2010, at 10:40 pm You knew the Islanders had to lose sometime. And you probably knew that the Islanders sweeping three of the East’s top four would probably be too good to be true. Yet, you’re disappointed that the Islanders lost tonight.
That’s a good thing.
I keep waiting for the Islanders to fall off the pace and out of the playoff picture. It hasn’t happened yet. At this point, I’m not so sure it’s ever going to happen. These Islanders looked like they belonged in this game, and they looked like they had a great chance to win. It’s a shame it didn’t work out.
Some thoughts on tonight’s game…
– Over the past two years, the Islanders have written the book on blowing three-goal leads. Tonight, they flipped that book around, coming back from three goals down on the road against the defending Stanley Cup champions. Even though the end result wasn’t there, the comeback was a great sign.
– If Garth Snow does nothing else next year, he has to get a big winger to play with John Tavares. He’s not big enough to do it all by himself, which is to be expected at 19 years old. Even so, it’s hard to watch him getting knocked around so frequently.
– Sidney Crosby didn’t do a whole lot to silence his “whiner” rep after Richard Park’s goal to tie the game. I get that it’s the captain’s job to let the ref know when he’s missing calls, but yapping with Park and Doug Weight doesn’t really accomplish a whole lot.
– The Sutton hit… just an unfortunate incident. Clearly, Sutton felt bad; he stayed on top of Pascal Dupuis until the whistle blew to make sure nobody else hit him. The refs got the call right, but it’s unfathomable that the ref behind the play made the call before the ref standing right next to the play. Even more unfathomable than that, though, was the discussion on MSG Plus that followed the play, in which the announcers – particularly Butch Goring – suggested that the hit was Dupuis’ fault for being in a bad position. We here at The Rivalry regularly sing the praises of the MSG Plus crew often, but this was uncalled for.
– The Isles got destroyed on faceoffs tonight. Not good when you’re facing a team with as many playmakers as the Penguins.
– Not to jump on the “The refs give Pittsburgh preferential treatment” bandwagon, but there were a few calls that probably didn’t need to be made. The two that stick out in my mind were the call on Kyle Okposo that set up the game-winning power play goal by Evgeni Malkin and the delay of game call on Dwayne Roloson. But that’s life. Good teams always get the calls.
– Kind of a dick move by Crosby, taking a shot on Roloson as time expired and the Penguins protecting a two-goal lead. The Isles and Penguins meet again in three weeks. Here’s hoping the Islanders haven’t forgotten by then.
All in all, an excellent effort for the Islanders, who probably deserved more than they got tonight. That said, giving the likes of Crosby and Malkin seven opportunities on the power play is usually a recipe for defeat, something which was the case in tonight’s game. Despite the loss, the Islanders should feel great about their play of late. The days of the sad-sack Islanders are rapidly coming to a close and are being replaced by this young, energetic team that can hang with anyone.
By Zach Schiff November 26, 2009, at 8:44 am Though it is cold and rainy, it is indeed Thanksgiving. I started to search for a pretty cool Hockey Thanksgiving image to put on here, but as soon as I saw pictures of those creepy fat birds that everyone else in America eats today, I decided not to.
Yes, I’m scared of turkeys.
Anyway, on a day that I’m thankful the Rangers gaining 4 points in 2 games for the first time since they beat LA and Toronto in back-to-backs in mid-October, I wish you the best today. (Sure, these 4 points came against 2 teams that haven’t won a combined playoff game since a 1997 series against Wayne Gretzky and the Rangers, but it’s still a good feeling.)
As for me, I’ll be in sunny San Diego starting tomorrow, and while you would think hockey would be the last thing on my mind, I’ll be glued to my cell phone for text message updates for the 3 games I’ll miss.
That Tampa Bay game is another big points, and if they can get 3 points against the Penguins, then that’s 9 out of 10 and a big step in the right direction. Of course, there’s a solid chance that Steven Stamkos will score 2 goals tomorrow, Marian Gaborik will score 1, and nobody else will score anything and they’ll lose 2-1. And taking 2 from Pittsburgh is more realistic (they can definitely win the home game on Monday, I believe).
I leave this website in the hands of Bryan, whom I’ll be seeing for some Thanksgiving hockey in less than an hour. I know Bryan was all set to write something last night, but then his daughter threw up because she ate too much. Since she ate dinner in my restaurant, I take full responsibility.
Happy Thanksgiving everyone.
By Zach Schiff October 17, 2009, at 11:22 pm What was refreshing (I hate that word) about tonight’s 4-1 Rangers’ victory over Toronto was the fact that the Maple Leafs are a weaker team.
I know what you’re thinking, and you’re right – a good team should always beat a weaker team.
The Rangers have had a horrible problem with losing to teams below them in the standings. It didn’t matter what the numbers on the back of the jersey were – whether they were 2, 9, and 11 or 68, 82, and 92, or 35 or 30. They would always play pretty tightly against better teams. They had good records against New Jersey and the Penguins, and they would keep up with Detroit (although they are 0-3 vs. the Wings since the lockout), yet they would give up 2 goals leads against Atlanta and they’d lose to Chicago when the Hawks had 5,000 fans in the crowd.
And tonight’s game was setting up for a fall. A 6-game winning streak; a team they just beat 7-2; a road game after a few days off; the opponents were looking for their first win of the season; and a nationally televised game in Canada where the refs might’ve called a lot of bogus penalties against the Rangers. In previous seasons, this would be a game they would be up 2-0, then disappointingly lose 4-2.
(To be fair, the referees called a good game although I would’ve liked to have seen Jason Blake get a penalty for running into Henrik Lundqvist on his breakaway.)
Is this team different? Very. Marian Gaborik and Vinny Prospal don’t quit; Brandon Dubinsky and Ryan Callahan aren’t intermittently good like last year (ok, Callahan played hard every shift last year but Dubinsky disappeared for weeks at a time); Chris Drury isn’t relied upon for offense so he can be a “behind-the-scenes” type player (killing penalties, blocking shots, etc.).
Yet there are 3 huge differences in this year’s team…
1) The defense moves the puck and shoots. Most “SHOOOOOT” shouts from the Garden crowd should be silenced this year. Wade Redden and Michal Rozsival aren’t passing up shots or missing the net as much since Mike Del Zotto and Matt Gilroy are passing and shooting on the power play. Hell, Dan Girardi had a two-goal game.
2) John Giannone said tonight that the Rangers lead the league in power play chances. Of course, they’ve played 8 games now (no team has played more than 8; a few have played as little as 5 or 6), but they’re also fast and hard-charging, which makes opponents more likely to hook, slash, grab and pull in order to get back into the play.
Think about it: Marek Malik used to take tons of penalties because he was slow. He would get beat, turn around, and have to grab a jersey or use his stick for leverage, gaining nothing but 2 minutes in the penalty box.
Now, you have Enver Lisin, Artem Anisimov, Sean Avery, and Gaborik skating. A defender is going to have to yank them when they get passed, and then it’s a power play.
3) Well, #3 is the whole point of the post. The Rangers are beating up on lesser teams. And to be honest, of the 8 games, only 3 are from teams who won’t make the playoffs (Leafs twice, Senators once). The Penguins and Capitals and Ducks are going to be in the playoffs, and the Devils and Kings have good chances of it.
But what happened when they played those non-playoff teams? They pounced. And that’s what good teams do.
By Zach Schiff October 8, 2009, at 7:57 am “It’s a power play goal! Petr Prucha!”
Last night, the Phoenix Coyotes went into Pittsburgh and took on the Penguins, and they won 3-0. What’s more impressive is that it was a power play goal. What’s more impressive is that he scored it while on his back, laying on a Penguin.
Check out the video of Prucha scoring while lying on Mark Eaton.
Happy Thursday to everyone.
By Zach Schiff October 3, 2009, at 1:27 am The Rangers did something today they haven’t done since before the lockout – they lost their season opener.
Of course, the difference between this year and the past 4 years is the quality of the opponent they played. Since the lockout, they haven’t played any teams that made the playoffs that season for their first game. They beat, in order, Philadelphia, Washington, Florida, and Tampa Bay. This year, not only did they have a team that will make the playoffs, they faced a team that won the Stanley Cup.
So, how have those teams who played the defending Stanley Cup Champions done when they got to see the banner raised?
Last year, defending champions Detroit played Toronto on the night they raised the banner, who missed the playoffs for the 4th straight year.
In 2007, defending champions Anaheim played Boston when they raised the banner (they played their first 2 games vs. LA in Europe, then went on a road trip, then played Boston in their home opener). Boston snuck into the playoffs but lost to Montreal in the first round.
In 2006, Carolina played Buffalo in their home opener when they celebrated winning the Stanley Cup. Buffalo had a fantastic start, a great year, and lost to Ottawa in Game 5 overtime to be eliminated from the playoffs in ‘07.
In 2005, Tampa Bay had a delayed celebration at home against Carolina. Carolina had a dream season and won the Stanley Cup.
In 2003, New Jersey played Toronto. Toronto wound up losing to Philadelphia in the 2nd round (the Flyers were very good in those playoffs, and the only reason they didn’t go on to the Finals that year is because Keith Primeau couldn’t play every shift and Brad Richards played the game of his life in Game 7).
In 2002, the Red Wings played Montreal, who missed the playoffs and ended up 5 games under .500.
Which will the Rangers be more like? Will they be #1 in the league like Buffalo and run out of steam in the Conference Finals? Will they miss the playoffs like last season’s Toronto and Montreal of ‘02? Will they win the Cup like Carolina did in ‘06? Probably not any of those scenarios. They’ll probably go hot, go cold, and then fight for a playoff spot in mid-March. They’ll clinch in early-April, and then have a 2nd round exit like Toronto in ‘03.
Of course, I’m hoping it’s different. But I’m also realistic.
I could be wrong. John Tortorella’s system could be good. Marian Gaborik looked very good vs. Pittsburgh in Game #1, and he might score 45 goals. Brandon Dubinsky even looked good last night. Plus, the defensive pairings I wanted were put on the ice tonight (Staal/Girardi; Redden/Gilroy; Rozsival/Del Zotto).
I’m not going to dissect last night’s game. You probably saw it. Sure, there’s a lot I can talk about – poor officiating; an excessive amount of odd-man rushes on Henrik Lundqvist; Mike Del Zotto being in the right spot twice but not being able to get good wood on the puck; Wade Redden’s $6.5M body check on Evgeni Malkin; Redden being near the net and playing physical until he sucked the last 6 minutes of the game; Marc-Andre Fleury’s game-breaking save on Vinny Prospal. But it’s a long season.
And with 5 more games against Pittsburgh, expect plenty of confusion about phantom penalties called in favor of the Penguins. (I say “in favor of the Penguins” instead of “against the Rangers” because for years, this site has been saying that the NHL doesn’t have a bias against any one team, but they do have a bias for Pittsburgh.)
It was an exciting game. They had some good chances. Gaborik can be incredible. Ales Kotalik and Prospal played good. Sean Avery can help a lot and hopefully will soon. But there were way too many odd-man rushes against Hank is too many. He is a great goalie, but he shouldn’t have to be the hero every game. And what are you going to do when he isn’t playing that game?
I’m also disappointed Alexei Semenov didn’t sign with the Rangers. Having a 7th d-man is a luxury they haven’t had in a while. Jason Strudwick was good in the locker room a few years back, but he wasn’t a great player. Last year, no d-man was help accountable because there was never a threat of benching one player. A veteran 7th man would mean a struggling player could take a seat, or a rookie with nerves could watch a game from up high one night to get his bearings back.
Anyway, it’s a long season. It’s been nice to start the season with 2 points every year, but there are 81 games left.
|
|
Tags: 
