|
|
By Zach Schiff  January 25, 2010, at 9:36 am  I will update later today about the Rangers game in Montreal. For the record, it’s the 1st time I’ve seen them lose in an opposing building (not including the Nassau Coliseum). I saw them win in Nashville, New Jersey, Philadelphia, and Montreal before the 6-0 disaster I witnessed first-hand Saturday night.
* * *
Do you know the differences in Dan Carcillo and Donald Brashear? Carcillo has 6 goals and 6 assists this year; Brashear had no goals and 1 assist. Carcillo dresses for games while Brashear stays nice and clean in a suit and tie. Carcillo wins fights (his record this year is 7-3-2, including beating Marian Gaborik and losing to Sean Avery last Thursday) while Brashear skates away from confrontation. In fact, the last fight Brashear won was against Jared Boll of Columbus three days before Thanksgiving. Brashear’s record this year stands at 3-4-2.
As for Brashear’s claims that he wouldn’t fight Carcillo – “I don’t even fight a guy like Carcillo. I don’t think he’s in my league.” – and then his claims that he isn’t a guy who only goes out and fights staged fights… well, what? Do you fight everyone or will you only fight heavyweights?
“If I would have played” Gaborik would not have been fought by Carcillo, Brashear said. Oh yeah? If you’re out there fighting people like Matt Carkner, Eric Boulton, Eric Godard, and Shawn Thornton, is that really a deterrent for people like Carcillo? Will he not get under Gaborik’s skin just because there is a chance that Brashear might lose a fight to Aaron Asham or Ian Laperriere?
Did Brashear’s presence in the first half of the season stop any team from running over Henrik Lundqvist? Were they afraid he was going to go after Ilya Kovalchuk or Johan Hedberg, or did they know that, no matter what, he would fight Boulton and leave everyone else alone?
Like what Carcillo did or not, he got the Flyers an extra 2 points that night. He got the best player on the team to thrown down his gloves and fight him. He threw an entire team off their game, because they then stopped trying to score and started looking for revenge. The only person nearly capable of getting under a team’s skin like that on the Rangers’ roster is Avery. Not Brashear.
Guess what, Donald. Carcillo might not be in your league for long – because he’ll still be in the NHL for the next decade.
By Zach Schiff January 18, 2010, at 12:54 pm Next Saturday, I will be venturing into Montreal to see the second game of the Home & Home with the Canadiens. Okay, it’s a home-and-home with 2 other games in between, but still, it stands to be more intriguing than a home game against Tampa Bay and a game in Philadelphia.
So, which jersey should I wear?
Should I go with the autographed Dan Girardi jersey?
The autographed Sean Avery?
Superstar Marian Gaborik?
New addition to my collection Vinny Prospal?
I normally like to wear Sean Avery jerseys when I’m in other buildings.
I did it in Nashville last year about a month after the Rangers got him back on re-entry waivers, and a few fans yelled “Sloppy Seconds!” at me. To recap, I am not Sean Avery, I just wear the jersey. And the Rangers won that game.
I wore it in New Jersey amid death threats from the upper level (directed at me, my friends, and Scott Gomez, playing his first game in Jersey since signing with the Rangers). Those were quieted when the Rangers won the game.
I wore it in Philadelphia, where some kid tried to body check my friend. “How could you wear a Sean Avery jersey in Philly?” one cigarette-smoking man asked me. Well, the Rangers won that game.
And I wore it in Montreal on Super Bowl Sunday when the Giants beat the Patriots. As I was on the escalator, there was a man in a Mike Komisarek Habs jersey in front of me. We had an awkward silence, then discussed what it would be like to really date Elisha Cuthbert. The Rangers went down 3-0, then won that game 5-3.
Should I keep the tradition alive, or change things up?
By Bryan Berg December 30, 2009, at 12:16 am The 2008 NHL Winter Classic was one of those events we’ll always remember. The novelty of an outdoor game, the snow falling, the almost-too-perfect ending with Sidney Crosby scoring in the shootout. The 2009 NHL Winter Classic was no less entertaining, with a resurgent Blackhawks team and the defending champion Red Wings taking over Wrigley Field. The 2009 game showed that the Winter Classic was a sustainable commodity, something that could get the casual sports fan to take an interest in the NHL. Most true hockey fans, though, had the same thought – as great as the Winter Classic is now, if there’s a way for the NHL to screw it up, they will certainly do so.
Fast forward to this year. The debate over who would play in the 2010 Winter Classic was red-hot, which is usually a great sign. Hockey fans had high expectations for the third installment of this event, and with good reason. So when the NHL announced that the Boston Bruins would be playing the Philadelphia Flyers at Fenway Park, many were a bit underwhelmed. Sure, Fenway Park is an iconic venue, but Bruins vs. Flyers?
Many have pointed to the Flyers’ sorry start to this season – 38 points in 38 games, 13th in the East – as proof that the NHL screwed this one up. My thought is that the NHL didn’t screw anything up. Instead, NBC stepped in and got who they wanted – as in, who they thought would pop the best rating. The far more appealing Bruins-Canadiens matchup was shelved, and instead we get Bruins-Flyers, a matchup of two teams who have no rivalry whatsoever and combined to win exactly one playoff series last year.
A Bruins-Canadiens Winter Classic would have done so much to promote the event as a true hockey event. The Montreal Canadiens have one of the richest traditions in all of sports, maybe even more rich than that of the almighty Yankees. Casual fans might not be able to name one player on the Canadiens roster, but they know the team and understand something about the their history. They could come to understand the Canadiens-Bruins rivalry (assuming the NHL and NBC promoted it) and get into this matchup, giving the Canadiens the same respect they’d give to any well-known NHL team. Lastly, and most importantly, including the Canadiens in the Winter Classic would have been a huge bone thrown in the direction of the Canadian teams, who got the ball rolling when it comes to outdoor games and deserves to be part of this event going forward.
Of course, that’s when NBC stepped in. I can picture the conversation…
GARY BETTMAN: For the 2010 Winter Classic, I’d like to have the Bruins host the Montreal Canadiens at Fenway Park.
NBC EXECUTIVE: The who?
GARY BETTMAN: The Montreal Canadiens.
NBC EXECUTIVE: What are they, an expansion team?
GARY BETTMAN: No, sir. They’ve been around for a hundred years. They’ve won 24 Stanley Cups. They may well be the most famous…
NBC EXECUTIVE: Hold it right there. I don’t know what you’re talking about with all this Montreal nonsense, but I’m not interested. This is NBC, damn it. We only show games that include the Penguins, Capitals, Rangers, Bruins and Flyers. Hey, Bruins and Flyers, that’d be a great matchup, no?
GARY BETTMAN: Not really.
NBC EXECUTIVE: Well, that’s how it’s going to be. If you think about it, it doesn’t really matter who the Bruins play. ESPN will see that a Boston team is involved and promote the hell out of it, so neither of us will have to do anything.
GARY BETTMAN: Good point. Besides, we don’t really care about our Canadian audience anyway.
NBC EXECUTIVE: Then it’s settled. It’ll be Bruins-Flyers at Fenway, and I’ll tell you what. We’ll put you in our NFL studio show for Wild Card weekend. We already have 30 analysts on that show, what’s one more?
(Both Bettman and the executive laugh uproariously, then roll around in a pile of money.)
OK, so maybe it didn’t go exactly like that. But it may as well have. In the mean time, the NHL is already doing everything it can to weaken its “flagship event”. (Editor’s note: Anytime your “flagship event” isn’t your championship game/series, you’re in trouble.) Bettman has talked about creating an outdoor game solely for Canada, largely because he knows there’s no way in hell NBC is letting a Canadian team anywhere near the Winter Classic. With more than one outdoor game in any given year, the NHL seriously risks ruining the uniqueness of the Winter Classic. It might be running against crappy college football games, but the viewing audience still needs something new and fresh to watch.
Sadly, NBC doesn’t do “new and fresh”. NBC does “whatever will get us the highest TV ratings possible”. So, while the 2010 Winter Classic might be about the Bruins and Flyers on paper, it’s a bit different to diehard hockey fans. Years from now, we may look back at the 2010 Winter Classic as the year the Winter Classic changed from a hockey event to a TV event – the year the NHL gave its huge showcase event to NBC in the name of ratings and advertising dollars. You know what the worst part is? The only thing that’s surprising is that it took this long.
By Zach Schiff October 21, 2009, at 8:42 am First off, I would like to thank longtime loyal NY Hockey Rivalry reader Lou for the seat upgrade at Monday’s game against the Sharks. Thanks to Lou, who had two extra tickets, me and my friend moved up to Section 94 – the purple seats in the lower bowl, 10 rows from the ice. Lou deftly knocked off a 22 ounce Heineken, a footlong hot dog with kraut, and a pretzel with mustard. Yours truly had his own 22 ounce Amstel Light, a pretzel, and popcorn. Pretzel was tasty (though not Nassau Coliseum-esque). Popcorn was not very good. Actually, of the 4 words on the box of popcorn, only one was true: Fresh Popcorn, Delicious! Crisp!
Second, I want to mention that Cory Murphy was placed on waivers by the New Jersey Devils. A few times in the past, I’d mentioned that I wanted to see Murphy in a Rangers sweater. While it’s not a pressing manner, I still think he’d be worth a shot as a 7th defenseman. He is 31, played college in New York (Colgate) and pro in Finland before coming to America in his late 20s. He can lead the power play pretty well but was never given the chance in Florida or Tampa Bay, and the Devils apparently gave up on him after being a -1 in 3 games.
Third, I am making my glorious return to Montreal in early 2010. In February of 2008, right before this website started, I went to a Rangers game at the Bell Centre. It was actually Super Bowl Sunday, the day the Giants beat the Patriots, and it was the only NHL game on the docket. The Rangers were down 3-0 but wound up winning 5-3 in an incredible game.
So this year, I return. January 23. Anyone else going to be there?
By Zach Schiff July 16, 2009, at 1:35 am Of course, no Ranger games will be played at the Coliseum next season. Got to save those for weeknights since they’ll close-to-sell-out anyway. No need to waste a Saturday where you’ll sell 14,000 tickets anyway, no matter who the opponent. I was right about that.
I was wrong, however, when I predicted that 80% of their last 10 games would be division rivals. In fact, only half are, and we get to see that always exciting “Florida road trip” in April. Whoa, Schedule Makers, I’ll make sure I take my heart medicine, because that’s one to get the blood pumping!
And of course, what season would be complete without a home & home versus Philadelphia?
When the Penguins won the Cup, an avid and eager reader of this website, Dan, sent a string of angry text messages. One of them predicted that the Rangers would be the opponent when the Penguins raise the Stanley Cup banner to the rafters. Indeed, a short month later, his Nostradamus-like prediction is in fact a reality. I’m not mad. First of all, it’s a crappy thing to get mad about. Second of all, maybe watching it will light an illusionary fire under the arses of certain Rangers players and get them going.
When the Rangers were awful in 2002-03, I wanted to send a mail to MSG. Specifically, I wanted to mail it to Gord Dwyer. I figured he never got any fan mail, so he would atleast open it, as opposed to sending it to Mark Messier or Tom Poti (it would have been lost in Poti’s hatemail). I wanted to send him the video tape of “Oh Baby!” which was the highlights of the 1993-94 season, from playing in Europe to winning the Cup in Game 7. I figured it would start a fire under him, and he would show it to everyone and they would then be inspired to reach for glory.
Alas, I never sent it, the Rangers missed the playoffs, and I’ve blamed myself ever since. So maybe the banner-raising ceremony in Steeltown will be the “Oh Baby!” that is still sitting on my desk upstairs in my room.
A few notes…
In 2005-06, the Rangers played a very short February also, due to the Olympics. They played 6 games and won all of them, 5 in regulation and 1 in overtime on a Jaromir Jagr goal (from Martin Rucinsky and Michal Rozsival… ah, to be Czech in America). This year, that’s do-able as well. Six games, 4 at home, including the Lightning and Predators.
With 24 games vs. the Atlantic, 40 vs. the rest of the East, and 15 against the West, that leaves them playing 3 Western teams twice this year. If I remember from last year, they played Chicago twice, Dallas twice, and the Ducks twice. This year’s repeat offenders are St. Louis, Phoenix, and Los Angeles.
No “California Trip” this year, since their only game out there is against LA. That trip sees them in Phoenix, Colorado, then LA. The “Florida Trip” not only happens near the end of the season, but the Rangers also make the same trip during Thanksgiving week, as they do every year (Panthers on Thanksgiving Eve, Lightning on Black Friday).
They do have a Western Canada trip, though, as they play Calgary, Vancouver, and Edmonton in early November. Mark that down as a loss, as they normally do awful on that road trip. That will also be Tom Renney’s first – and only – meeting with his old team. They also stop in Minnesota before hitting Canada.
Don’t bank on any romantic Friday evenings at the Garden. The Rangers have 6 road games on a Friday (including the opener in Pittsburgh) but if you want to see them in the City on a Friday, you’ll have to wait until the last home game of the year, 4/9/10 (looks weird to write!) against the Flyers.
Three home games that my girlfriend will kill me if I don’t sell my tickets: 11/21 vs. Florida, her birthday; 2/14 vs. Tampa Bay, Valentine’s Day; and 3/18 vs. St. Louis, our anniversary.
Possible road trips: October 24 & January 23, Montreal; December 9, Chicago; December 17, Philadelphia; January 9 & March 21, Boston; March 6, Washington; March 27, Toronto; December 21 & 31, Carolina. Sadly, no trip to Nashville is in the works, atleast not for a hockey game.
By Bryan Berg July 8, 2009, at 8:54 pm Today, Claude Lemieux announced his retirement. Again.
Those of you who have read this blog for a while know that we’re both big fans of the man known as “Pepe”. He was the typical pest – great if he’s on your team, a nightmare if he isn’t. Modern-day agitators such as Sean Avery only wish they could have been as effective as Claude Lemieux.
Quite frankly, if the Hockey Hall of Fame Class of 2012 does not include Claude Lemieux, something is seriously wrong. And how fitting would it be if Lemieux were to be inducted alongside his former Avalanche teammate Joe Sakic? Of course, there will be plenty of detractors who will call Lemieux a dirty player. These are the same people who gushed over players like Bobby Clarke and Scott Stevens, so there you go. Anyway, let’s take this moment to go over some of Lemieux’s Hall credentials.
- Four Stanley Cups (1986, 1995, 1996, 2000). It should also be pointed out that each of these Cups came on different tours of duty. As in, he helped make four different teams into winners. Also, he never lost in a Stanley Cup Final.
- 80 playoff goals, good for 9th best in NHL history.
- 1995 Conn Smythe winner.
- Nine seasons with 20+ goals and 100+ penalty minutes. To put that into proper context, only five players accomplished this feat in 2008-09.
- Nine trips to the conference finals or beyond.
- 379 regular season goals. Not bad for a guy primarily known for his playoff scoring.
- Came back to the NHL at age 43 and played a regular shift on a team that won the President’s Trophy.
That last one might be the most significant one of all. Even though his skills had largely eroded, Lemieux was still able to show something to a group of players who weren’t even alive when he was drafted. It’s a shame the Sharks choked in the playoffs, as is customary for them, because Lemieux winning a fifth Cup would have been such a great story.
As it is, Lemieux retires with his head held high, knowing he could still do it. Truth is, he always could do it. He just had the misfortune to have high goal totals in an era where goal totals were extremely high, then nearly killed Kris Draper. There wasn’t a period in Claude Lemieux’s career where he wasn’t an underrated player. I hope his retirement will educate some of the nay-sayers – as well as the aforementioned haters who claim Lemieux was a dirty player – on what was a spectacular career.
As one of my favorite non-Islanders of all-time, I always wonder what might have happened if things were different. It’s a little-known fact that Claude Lemieux was an Islander for a very brief time. The Islanders acquired Lemieux from New Jersey after the 1995 season, then immediately shipped him off to Colorado for Wendel Clark. (Trivia question: Who went to New Jersey in exchange for Lemieux?) Surely, Lemieux wouldn’t have won a Stanley Cup with an awful Islanders team in 1995-96, but I would have cherished the chance to watch a true great, a legitimate Hall of Famer, for 82 games. Lemieux always shined in the playoffs, but he was never anything but a tremendous talent who could do it all.
|
|
Tags: 
