|
|
By Bryan Berg  December 1, 2009, at 10:34 pm  It was only a matter of time before the Matt Moulson puff piece was written. This actually came out about a week and a half ago, but it was so horrendous I had to share it. No, there are no Molson Canadian beer puns in this one… but fear not, as some awful wordplay still awaits you! By the way, sorry if the font jumps around in size a bit – you can blame ESPN.com’s cracked web staff for that.
ST. LOUIS -
At the risk of offending Linda Hamilton and the entire Moulson family and that furry guy in the old television series (Ron Perlman)
Anyone have any idea what this means? Me either. But I’m sure it’d make sense if I were like 30 years older.
Beauty-and-beast? Dynamic duo? Asinine alliteration? The books I read my 19-month-old daughter feature more clever wordplay.
But put it this way: Moulson, the hitherto anonymous 26-year-old winger who quickly has become the cheese to Tavares’ macaroni through the first quarter of this surprising season for the Islanders, was drafted in the ninth round of the 2003 draft, 263rd overall.
There are 43 words in this sentence. I’ll sum them up in four – Matt Moulson was unheralded.
They don’t even have a ninth round anymore. GMs figured it was better to pack up early and go golfing or head to a bar than stick around and draft players in the ninth round.
Or, the eighth and ninth rounds of the draft were lopped off after the lockout because GMs had like a week to prepare for the draft once the lockout ended. Or the owners didn’t to be stuck paying two extra draft picks. Either way, I’m sure it had nothing to do with golfing or drinking. By the way, Mark Streit was a 9th round selection of Montreal in 2004, meaning the Islanders probably have more 9th round draft picks on their active roster than any other team in history.
Does Moulson, who has 18 points, including five multipoint efforts, through the Islanders’ first 23 games, get tired of being treated like the hockey guy who fell to Earth?
He laughed.
“It doesn’t really bother me,” he told ESPN.com. “I’m here now in the NHL. I guess I have an interesting story to tell. It’s always interesting for people to find out things like that and maybe a good story for some younger kids.”
See, this is why we don’t go the route of some of our Blog Box colleagues and actually talk to the players. They do a good job with it. We can’t. Why? Because hockey players are BORING. Sorry to say it, but it’s true. What was Moulson supposed to say here? “I’m tired of being treated like the hockey guy who fell to Earth”? Furthermore, what does that even mean? Did Moulson arrive in a UFO? My head hurts now.
Indeed, an apprehensive Moulson was in regular touch with agent Wade Arnott as the July free-agency period approached and his contract with the Los Angeles Kings expired. “I was bugging him every day, ‘Where do you think I’m going to end up?’” Moulson said.
I’m sure Wade Arnott was like, “Who’s this Moulson guy who keeps calling me every day?”.
Tavares was among the first people Moulson called when his deal was completed during that first week of free agency.
“I was right on the phone to Johnny, and it was a pretty good moment,” Moulson said. “I still didn’t know what was going to come of it, but I was excited.”
I distinctly recall reading about the Moulson signing and loudly exclaiming the following words – “Who the hell is Matt Moulson?”. So did every single Islanders fan out there – even the ones who *knew* he’d work out from the moment he signed the contract.
“Matt was a guy that I knew from my days in Providence when he was playing in Manchester. I thought he had the ability to score. But I went back and I watched some of the goals in the NHL, which were goal scorer-type goals, and as it turned out through exhibition, he was our leading goal scorer,” Gordon told ESPN.com.
Yes, because scoring goals in exhibition games guarantees success in the regular season. You know who led the league in points during the pre-season? Former Islander Mike Comrie, he of the eight points in 16 regular season games. But I’m sure he’ll rebound in plenty of time to win the Hart and Art Ross Trophies, even if he’s got mono right now.
“The thing that’s good about Matt is if he’s not scoring from the tops of the circle, he’s scoring from the front of the net. That ability to score from two different places, you’re talking about two different types of players. Some guys don’t like to go into traffic. But the fact he was willing to do that, I thought it would be a good complement for John.”
Truer words have never been spoken. And by “truer words”, I mean “cliches that apply to virtually every forward in the NHL”.
And?
“We didn’t have a lot of options,” Gordon added.
That’s more like it.
“Actually, when people kept cutting down my skating, cutting down my skating, Mike O’Connell, when he was with L.A., he told me to look at a player named Andrew Brunette,” Moulson said, crediting the former Bruins GM who is now with the Kings’ player-development staff.
“I used to tape all his games and watch them and watch what he did,” Moulson said. “[Brunette] may not be the fastest guy out there, but he’s great at protecting the puck and making plays around the net and getting to the net. He was up and down in the AHL as well starting his career, and he’s made a pretty good player of himself and pretty good name for himself in this league. He’s someone I followed closely.”
Okay, this is actually something useful. This is something I didn’t know and is nice to hear. It makes infinitely more sense to emulate a guy like Brunette than a superstar. But nobody does it, because you never see the grinders on SportsCenter. Oh, wait, you never see the superstars of the NHL on SportsCenter, either.
This week Moulson met his guide, who of course had no idea he’d had any impact whatsoever on his career.
“He gave me a stick last night,” Moulson said happily.
You mean Brunette stuck him, as in speared him?
ZOMG! ROFLMAO!
“No, no, he signed a stick and gave it to me last night. I got it this morning,” Moulson said.
Oh. See, hockey players ARE boring.
“I got it this morning, and I had a grin from ear to ear. I told him he was one of my favorite players.”
I’m sure Andrew Brunette has never been referred to as “one of my favorite players” by anybody outside of the Brunette family and Matt Moulson.
“I told him when he made the team out of camp, ‘Treat every day like it’s your last, because you don’t know,’” Gordon said. “‘You battled high odds to make the team, but that doesn’t mean tomorrow won’t be a different day. You have to prove everybody right that we made the right decision every single day.’”
That’s right, Scott Gordon. Matt Moulson’s singular focus over his first 27 games has been to prove to everybody that Garth Snow is a genius. As opposed to, you know, proving that he’s actually a pretty good player. Moulson, that is, not Snow. We all know Snow could never make it in the post-lockout NHL.
“It seems funny from where I started from until now. I get two goals against Boston [Monday night], and I’m upset because I wanted a third one. I’m not disappointed but wanting more after that. Coming from where I came from, I never thought I’d be wanting more after a two-goal game in the NHL.”
If I had a two-goal game in the NHL, I’d be wanting more. But it’d probably involve sexual favors, as opposed to a third goal.
Beautiful.
The first few times I read this, I thought to myself, “That’s an odd way to end this piece.” Eventually, I realized it was a play on the copious beauty-and-the-beast analogies found in the article, many of which I edited out for the benefit of your sanity. I still have no proof of any beast-like tendencies in Matt Moulson, or Andrew Brunette, for that matter. So, you know, hooray for Matt Moulson and all that.
Bad Hockey Writing, espn, Fire Joe Morgan, garth snow, john tavares, Matt Moulson, new york islanders, scott gordon
By Bryan Berg November 17, 2009, at 10:16 pm One quarter of the way through the 2009-10 NHL season, the New York Islanders are tied for fifth place in the Eastern Conference.
Did you ever, in your wildest dreams, envision this scenario? Last year, around this time, the season peaked as the Islanders approached .500 and the eighth seed. That team crapped out and finished with 61 points. This year’s Islanders team has 23 points after just 21 games. Over 82 games, that projects to 90 points. If you’re thinking playoffs already, I’ve always used the Rule of 92 when it comes to playoff teams – as in, you need 92 or more points to stake a claim to a playoff spot. But even 92 points guarantees you nothing. Florida missed the playoffs last year with 93 points. Carolina had 92 points in 2007-08, but finished ninth. In other words, the Islanders will have to play even better than they are now – and sustain that level of play for 61 more games – if they want to make the playoffs.
Now, contrary to popular belief, the playoffs are not the sole determinant of a team being “for real”. Most Islanders fans will take contention for a playoff spot as constituting a “real” team. Hell, I’m just happy the season isn’t over at Thanksgiving. The question is, though, can the Islanders keep this up? Are the Islanders for real?
In short… yes, the Islanders are for real.
Botta wrote a piece earlier today about why the Islanders have gotten off to their hot start. I won’t regurgitate his rationale. But health, goaltending, John Tavares and Matt Moulson have all helped. It also helps that the players are better suited to Scott Gordon’s system; Gordon has helped his own cause by not dressing the likes of Joel Rechlicz and Mitch Fritz for three minutes a game. In short, everyone on the team has a role, and everyone fills theirs well. Even Jeff Tambellini has produced this year, before his inexplicable (and unexplained) absence on this road trip. And speaking of road games, the Islanders have nabbed 11 of 24 possible road points this year – not too shabby.
Perhaps the best thing about this Islanders team is that the Lighthouse isn’t looming over the on-ice product – finally. It’s amazing what can happen when the focus is solely on the on-ice product. The only unfortunate fallout from the Lighthouse happenings is that Charles Wang likely won’t let Garth Snow spend big bucks to bolster the Isles’ roster, but we’re all probably better off that way. This Islanders team is pretty deep, and the eventual return of Rick DiPietro can only help matters.
There are still some questions about this team, some criteria I have for a good team that the Islanders aren’t reaching as of yet. First, they’ve allowed more goals than they’ve scored. The disparity has come down significantly in recent weeks, but it’s still there. Second, for all the talk about how the Islanders are above. 500 – they’re not. It’s this writer’s opinion (I don’t believe Zach shares this opinion) that .500 means winning half your games, not having more wins than losses. Let’s not forget that the Islanders are actually 8-13 and have fattened up on, as Howie Rose would call them, “loser points”. Oh, and the Islanders have played the most games of anyone in the East.
These are nit-picking issues Islanders fans are wont to come up with, mainly because we’re so used to seeing the other shoe drop in excruciating fashion. I, for one, am not even thinking about the playoffs, 92 points, winning 41 of 82 games, or any of the other criteria I’d use to gauge a team’s level of success. With these Islanders, they’re simply fun to watch. They play hard, as they always have, but this year they have an added layer of skill that scores three goals per game and (usually) keeps them from self-destructing in the third period. After a summer full of Lighthouse acrimony and worrying about Snow screwing up the draft, Islanders fans deserve to watch this brand of entertaining hockey.
And yes, that entertaining hockey played by the Islanders makes them “for real”.
By Bryan Berg October 30, 2009, at 7:35 am 
When you’re a fan of a losing team, you generally don’t watch them expecting to win. Instead, you watch hoping you’ll see something amazing. For example, even though the Mets were out of playoff contention in July, I still watched them most nights, just in case they finally pitched a no-hitter (yeah, I know) or did something particularly special. In hockey, there are no milestones that would compare to a no-hitter, so I hope for very memorable games, the kind that transcend a losing season. Last year, beating Detroit and Chicago on the road were such games, and Opening Night would have been such a game had the Islanders pulled it out.
Wednesday night’s game against the Rangers would certainly qualify as what I’d call a memorable game. If the Islanders to produce a 2009-10 highlight video, highlights of Wednesday night would be heavily featured. The Islanders played their game, were intense throughout, and won their first regulation game by sheer will. The Islanders also won because of a growing trend in their play – their success in the faceoff circle.
Over the summer, I read Moneyball by Michael Lewis. Moneyball, for those who don’t know, explains how the small-market Oakland A’s of Major League Baseball were able to stay competitive with teams like the Yankees by building their team around undervalued assets like walks and on-base percentage. As I read Moneyball, I tried to figure out what statistics in hockey could be the basis for a winning team in today’s NHL. One of these days, I’ll post my thoughts. For now, though, perhaps the most important stat I’d build around would be faceoff percentage.
Think about it. There are approximately 60 faceoffs in a game. The average team, of course, wins 50 percent of those faceoffs, meaning that they begin play with the puck 30 times a game. A team that wins 60 percent of their faceoffs, on the other hand, begins with the puck 36 times. That’s twelve times more than their opponent. So, not only do you have the edge twelve more times than your opponent, that’s twelve times that your opponent can’t score until you give up the puck.
As of right now, the Islanders sit at third in the NHL with a success rate of 54.1% in the faceoff circle, with the Isles dominating faceoffs in their past few games. And while this success hasn’t resulted in wins just yet, there’s plenty of reason for optimism – aside from the Islanders (.409), Minnesota (.250) and Nashville (.458), every team over 50% in faceoffs has earned more than half of the points it could have possibly earned so far this season. What’s particularly telling about the Islanders’ success is that it’s been widespread. Every eligible Islander is over 50% in faceoffs this year, including John Tavares at 50.3%, Josh Bailey at 53.9%, and both Doug Weight and Nate Thompson at 58.8%. What does all of this mean? Simply put, if the Islanders are better than their opponents at controlling the puck off the draw, they’re that much more likely to control play and potentially generate good scoring chances. In addition, their opponents will have to make more plays on defense than usual in order to get the puck. And if the Islanders can get past their third period hiccups – as they did on Wednesday night – their faceoff skills can help them become a truly dangerous team.
By Bryan Berg October 16, 2009, at 9:49 pm Another game, another loss for the Islanders. That’s five straight losses to open the season, in case you lost count. Personally, I don’t care about the wins and losses; this season is about improvement and developing young players, and these things don’t always show up on the stat sheet. Far more significant than the end result is how the team played on the way to that result. Tonight… um… they didn’t play that well. Here’s what I saw tonight…
– As the puck dropped tonight, I thought about how strange it was that the Islanders completely changed their goaltending. It’s not common for teams to get rid of both of their goalies, but the Isles did just that. Most of us were glad to see this. However, Dwayne Roloson’s five-hole is giving me nightmares of the Ron Hextall era. Please let Martin Biron start tomorrow night.
– Speaking of roster moves, Rob Schremp should find himself in the Tambellini position tomorrow night, as he had a rather Tamby-esque game tonight. Here’s hoping Schremp finds the pretzel twists as delicious as Zach and I do. I also hope Tambellini can make the most of his opportunity, assuming it does come his way tomorrow.
– Mark Streit is usually pretty reliable on the defensive end, but he got caught napping twice in the offensive zone tonight. One of those times led to the penalty shot that put the Sabres up 2-0. What happens if the Sabres don’t score that goal? Who knows? But these mistakes don’t make losses easier to stomach.
- Tim Jackman and Joel Rechlicz played 10:46 tonight. That’s 10:46 COMBINED. Even with their totals added together, that’s less than any individual Islanders player, just edging Josh Bailey. This brings up two points. First, why waste roster spots with guys who barely play; furthermore, why play guys who can’t, you know, play? Second, it’s not very smart to totally stunt Josh Bailey’s development as a player by teaming him with stiffs like Jackman. Josh Bailey is a playmaker. Tim Jackman has seven goals in 142 NHL games.
– If I were Scott Gordon, I’d take every young player the organization is trying to build around and give those players serious minutes on the penalty kill. Letting up power play goals doesn’t matter in a lost season (yes, the season is five games old, but we all know the Isles aren’t going anywhere), but it can pay dividends down the line. John Tavares played 56 shorthanded seconds tonight; let’s see that number go up. And for the record, Gordon does a great job of spreading out his minutes, but it’d be great to see him essentially force players to learn the defensive side of the game as they develop.
– Speaking of Tavares, every single time he touches the puck in the offensive zone, he’s liable to create something. He managed to score a goal tonight, but of more interest to me were the two open nets he missed and the countless times he stickhandled out of trouble. Every time he touches the puck, I’m amazed. His hockey sense is uncanny and can literally make something out of nothing; given the lack of quality NHL players on this roster, often times, he’ll have to do just that. What a tremendous player, and what a treat it is to watch him play.
– My last note for tonight – why, oh why, must the Islanders constantly be relegated to the dregs of MSG Plus 2? They played on Channel 414 tonight and they will be there again tomorrow, despite being at home and despite the Rangers being on the road. I understand the Islanders’ ratings do not compare well to those of the Rangers and the Devils, but if the Islanders are at home, they really should be shown in high definition. It’s a bit depressing to look for the Islanders game on TV and see that they can’t even crack the double digits on the dial. This only helps perpetuate the image that the Islanders are a second-class organization, which surely doesn’t help the Islanders as they attempt to rebuild all the facets of their team.
Busy night tomorrow. My predictions: The Rangers win 4-2 over the Maple Leafs, while the Isles lose 5-3 to the Sharks.
By Bryan Berg October 10, 2009, at 10:34 pm As the New York Islanders played the kind of third period only they can play – you know, the kind of third period that starts out with a three-goal lead and ends in a tie game – I felt a certain calmness. Maybe it’s because I was watching the game with friends. Maybe it’s because I’m waiting for my wife to go into labor and hockey isn’t as important as it ordinarily is. Maybe it’s because I saw it coming from a mile away. But I think it’s something different. Namely, I’m cool with losing this game because, quite honestly, wins and losses don’t matter right now.
Nobody is going to confuse the 2009-10 Islanders for a great team, a playoff team, or even a mediocre team. This is a young group who’s going to have plenty of tough times before things improve. Yes, it’s troubling that many of the key players in tonight’s loss also blew many third-period leads last season. At the same time, the Islanders’ young players need experience when an opposing team finds it second gear and makes an all-out push to preserve one (or two) points. That’s what the Islanders saw tonight.
Make no mistake about it, the Bruins thought they were going to get two easy points tonight. We’ve seen it a million times. Boston started its backup goalie and didn’t exactly play with a ton of urgency in the first two periods. Their fans seemed more preoccupied with the floundering Red Sox than anything the Bruins were doing. But when the Bruins needed to turn it on, they did. The Islanders, on the other hand, simply proved what we suspected all along – they aren’t at the Bruins’ level just yet.
It’s one thing to play well when your opponents are barely showing a pulse. It’s another to weather the storm when they’re playing at full capacity and you’ve got to take their best shots. Last year, the Islanders were in this position many times, but it happened mainly before injuries forced the team to truly rely on its youth. Now, the young players are the focal point of the team; they will learn more from this loss than they would have learned if they’d won.
So far, the Islanders have played three games and have forced overtime in each of these three games. These three games have been against the defending Stanley Cup champions, an improved Ottawa team and a team that finished one point shy of the President’s Trophy last year. This is nothing to be ashamed of. If anything, Islanders fans should be proud that their team is pushing elite teams to the brink. They should also be pleased that players like John Tavares and Matt Moulson are contributing right away. Sure, Dwayne Roloson hasn’t made a save in five shootout chances, but at least they’re getting that far. There’s still plenty to be excited about in Islander Country.
By Bryan Berg October 3, 2009, at 11:27 pm The Islanders lost tonight in a shootout against the Pittsburgh Penguins. The cynic in me thinks that these are the same old Islanders who can’t hold a lead against a good team. That part of me is legitimately crestfallen after this loss. After all, this was one of those nights that just seemed too perfect to screw up, and we won’t have many of those nights this season, especially with the specter of the Lighthouse Project looming large.
Having said all that…
How can you possibly be upset about tonight’s game? The Isles looked pretty awesome for much of the game. John Tavares made his debut in just about as grand a fashion as you could imagine, and that’s the biggest thing. For those who attended the game, his first goal is a memory that will never be forgotten. From a practical perspective, it’s great that Tavares got all of his firsts (first point, first goal, first shootout attempt) out of the way in one night. Hard to knock that kind of performance.
I’m not saying wins and losses don’t matter. What I am saying is that this season is about developing young talent, and we saw significant evidence that John Tavares is ready to contribute to this team right now. If the Islanders focus on developing Tavares and his young counterpart, the wins will come soon enough. Good teams always get the lucky bounces, as tonight’s shootout showed. Someday, the Islanders will get those breaks.
For now, we have four days to reflect. Not on the loss or the expiration of Charles Wang’s “certainty” deadline, but on the spectacular debut of John Tavares and what other tricks he may have in store for us. If Tavares is even half the difference-maker he was tonight, we’re in store for a special season, regardless of the Isles’ win-loss record.
|
|
Tags: 
