|
|
By Zach Schiff  December 5, 2009, at 2:34 pm  Four years ago, you could have said the Rangers would get 2 points in this weekend’s back-to-back games, one in Buffalo and then home against Detroit. They could’ve beaten the Sabres but would have been mauled by the Red Wings.
Three years ago, you could’ve written this weekend off as a total loss. The Sabres were flying on the wings of Danny Briere and Chris “More Than 2 Goals in 22 Games” Drury, and the Red Wings again would have mauled them.
This year, it could be interesting.
The Sabres are flying high at 16-7-2 and are on a 4-game winning streak. They are also 9-3-2 at home, while the Rangers are 6-7-1 on the road. However, the Rangers are well-rested and have arguably the best player in the league playing for them. If Marian Gaborik scores another 2 goals tonight and Henrik Lundqvist shows up with a good performance, they can steal 2 big points from a conference rival.
The Red Wings, however, are just 3 games over .500 and are breaking even on the road. Old incarnations of the Wings have mauled the Rangers every game. There was a cold January game in 2006 where Brendan Shanahan buried them for 2 goals (the Rangers lost 4-3, but there was a late 3rd period goal to make it seem closer); there was a game when Shanahan was a Ranger where the Rangers were winning 3-1 and then stopped playing and lost 4-3 (that was the night Sean Avery was traded to the Rangers); and then there was last year, where Aaron Voros scored 2 goals and the Rangers still lost, in overtime (Aaron Voros… two goals? What?).
Though the Red Wings are struggling, so are the Rangers, and the Rangers do have to travel back from Buffalo in order to play this game. Detroit has a game in New Jersey tonight; traveling from Jersey to New York, however time-consuming the traffic may be, is not as bad as a flight home from Buffalo.
This weekend is really a crapshoot. If I was guessing, I would say they win in Buffalo and get mauled by Detroit. However, knowing my betting record, they’re going to beat Detroit but lose tonight to Buffalo.
Hey, maybe back being in Buffalo will wake Chris Drury and Ales Kotalik up.
* * *
In answer to reader Eric the Lev, who inquired if I thought John Tortorella would get fired like John Stevens – no, I don’t. It’s way too soon to tell if he will last. The team is suffering injuries and are still treading water. However, I think the tide will have to sway in his favor soon to save some more jobs.
In my opinion, the GM should be gone. One coach (Tom Renney) didn’t work. Another one is having problems. Time to point the finger at the man who signed Wade Redden, Michal Rozsival, and Chris Drury to a total of $19M per season, isn’t it?
I also don’t know why Stevens was fired from Philadelphia. The team is doing decent and most of the team is performing well. They don’t have good goaltending yet are staying competitive in games.
I think he was fired because of pre-season expectations. Everyone predicted the Flyers to be great and go deep into the playoffs, yet they have a weak blueline (including overrated Chris Pronger) and poor goaltending (although Ray Emery and Brian Boucher have been playing better than I thought, they still aren’t a top-notch tag team). So they fire the coach, bring in Peter Laviolette, and hope for the best. Bad move.
By Zach Schiff November 4, 2009, at 12:21 pm The last two times that the Edmonton Oilers faced the Rangers, the Rangers lost in a shootout. Last time, they fired 42 shots on net and scored on only 2 – on a backup goaltender. Ah, the Tom Renney era…
Well, tomorrow, the Rangers meet Tom Renney again, and while not many current players were there for a lot of his reign (Henrik Lundqvist and Michal Rozsival were the only ones there from his first full season in 2005-06), it should be an emotional night for him. Imagine if the game were at Madison Square Garden?
 While I rip on Renney a lot here, I do think he was a very good coach, and I’m sure he will be sometime soon. There are a few coaches who will “always be a Ranger,” no matter where they wind up coaching or working. Mike Keenan, though he only had 1 season, is one of them. Renney is another.
No coach could have done what he did after the lockout. He took a team destined to fail -at least according to the experts – and brought them into the playoffs, one point away from winning the division. He got 123 points out of Jaromir Jagr – a man who would have refused to return to the NHL if he wasn’t playing for Renney in New York, he once said. He turned a team of veterans – Rucchin, Jagr, Straka, Rucinsky, Kasparaitis, Nylander – and young no-names – Jay Ward, Ortmeyer, Dom Moore, Hollweg, Orr, Prucha, Betts – into a contender.
I still say that if not for the Olympics, the Rangers could have gone far that year. Jagr and Lundqvist came back injured – Jagr with hip and groin problems, Hank with headaches from grinding his teeth. And then there was Sandis Ozolinsh, who seemed like a good trade at first until he came apart in the Devils’ series and cost the team 2 games.
Still, Renney was a huge part of the rebuilding process. While they rebuilt, he brought them into the playoffs. He just wasn’t a good fit for the team last year and going forward. His style had stopped working, and he continued to play people based on their paychecks rather than skill (see: Wade Redden on the power play while Petr Prucha sat in street clothes).
For all the good he did, he will be remembered for 2 things: being fired when the team couldn’t score and for Game 5 in Buffalo, where Fedor Tyutin and rookie Dan Girardi were on the ice with 30 seconds left with a 1-0 lead. When they iced the puck, Tyutin and Girardi had to stay on, they couldn’t clear the puck, and Chris Drury scored.
Besides that being the one game that still upsets my stomach (and the only time I ever lost sleep over a sports event), you know that if they won that game and went up 3-2 in the series, they would not have lost Game 6 at MSG. I’m not saying they would have won the Stanley Cup – hell, they might not even have beaten Ottawa in the Conference Finals – but they would have beaten Buffalo. And maybe Chris Drury never would’ve been signed the following summer, and maybe everything would’ve been different.
But this is how it’s played out, and I wish Tom Renney the best in Edmonton – no matter how often I make fun of his healthy scratches or his power play.
By Bryan Berg October 16, 2009, at 9:49 pm Another game, another loss for the Islanders. That’s five straight losses to open the season, in case you lost count. Personally, I don’t care about the wins and losses; this season is about improvement and developing young players, and these things don’t always show up on the stat sheet. Far more significant than the end result is how the team played on the way to that result. Tonight… um… they didn’t play that well. Here’s what I saw tonight…
– As the puck dropped tonight, I thought about how strange it was that the Islanders completely changed their goaltending. It’s not common for teams to get rid of both of their goalies, but the Isles did just that. Most of us were glad to see this. However, Dwayne Roloson’s five-hole is giving me nightmares of the Ron Hextall era. Please let Martin Biron start tomorrow night.
– Speaking of roster moves, Rob Schremp should find himself in the Tambellini position tomorrow night, as he had a rather Tamby-esque game tonight. Here’s hoping Schremp finds the pretzel twists as delicious as Zach and I do. I also hope Tambellini can make the most of his opportunity, assuming it does come his way tomorrow.
– Mark Streit is usually pretty reliable on the defensive end, but he got caught napping twice in the offensive zone tonight. One of those times led to the penalty shot that put the Sabres up 2-0. What happens if the Sabres don’t score that goal? Who knows? But these mistakes don’t make losses easier to stomach.
- Tim Jackman and Joel Rechlicz played 10:46 tonight. That’s 10:46 COMBINED. Even with their totals added together, that’s less than any individual Islanders player, just edging Josh Bailey. This brings up two points. First, why waste roster spots with guys who barely play; furthermore, why play guys who can’t, you know, play? Second, it’s not very smart to totally stunt Josh Bailey’s development as a player by teaming him with stiffs like Jackman. Josh Bailey is a playmaker. Tim Jackman has seven goals in 142 NHL games.
– If I were Scott Gordon, I’d take every young player the organization is trying to build around and give those players serious minutes on the penalty kill. Letting up power play goals doesn’t matter in a lost season (yes, the season is five games old, but we all know the Isles aren’t going anywhere), but it can pay dividends down the line. John Tavares played 56 shorthanded seconds tonight; let’s see that number go up. And for the record, Gordon does a great job of spreading out his minutes, but it’d be great to see him essentially force players to learn the defensive side of the game as they develop.
– Speaking of Tavares, every single time he touches the puck in the offensive zone, he’s liable to create something. He managed to score a goal tonight, but of more interest to me were the two open nets he missed and the countless times he stickhandled out of trouble. Every time he touches the puck, I’m amazed. His hockey sense is uncanny and can literally make something out of nothing; given the lack of quality NHL players on this roster, often times, he’ll have to do just that. What a tremendous player, and what a treat it is to watch him play.
– My last note for tonight – why, oh why, must the Islanders constantly be relegated to the dregs of MSG Plus 2? They played on Channel 414 tonight and they will be there again tomorrow, despite being at home and despite the Rangers being on the road. I understand the Islanders’ ratings do not compare well to those of the Rangers and the Devils, but if the Islanders are at home, they really should be shown in high definition. It’s a bit depressing to look for the Islanders game on TV and see that they can’t even crack the double digits on the dial. This only helps perpetuate the image that the Islanders are a second-class organization, which surely doesn’t help the Islanders as they attempt to rebuild all the facets of their team.
Busy night tomorrow. My predictions: The Rangers win 4-2 over the Maple Leafs, while the Isles lose 5-3 to the Sharks.
By Zach Schiff July 9, 2009, at 3:38 pm Well, he’s no Alex Tanguay, but Ales Kotalik is now a New York Ranger. He comes fresh off a 43-point season (in 75 games), but he scored 11 in 19 after being sent to Edmonton from Buffalo. In fact, he’s had 2 43-point seasons in a row and has only cracked 60 once, in 2005-06, where he had 25 goals. That was the only season of his career where he’s had a full docket of 82 games also.
So another injured player for the Rangers, another 3rd liner for John Tortorella’s “system,” but I do like him. It’s an upgrade over Aaron Voros, Donald Brashear, and Mark Bell.
The term is suspect though – 3 years, $9M. Are 43 points really worth $3M per year? (His Cap hit was $2.333M last season.) I hope this doesn’t screw the team at the trade deadine, when they’ll need to get a scorer on the market to make a push for the playoffs. I’m afraid they won’t have any cap room to get a player they need, because they also need to make atleast one more medium-sized signing this offseason (a center or a defenseman, I would guess). To be honest, I was hoping for a 2 year, $4M contract (or maybe $5M for a Cap hit of $2.5M per).
He is 30, will be 31 in December, but he’s a fast player and he’s big. He’s 6′1″, 230 pounds. He also plays the power play – of his 43 points last year, 23 were on the power play. (For comparison, Scott Gomez had 17 of his 58 on the power play, and he played nearly every power play.)
I’m not upset about this at all. Nik Zherdev will be gone, a right winger who can pot 20-25 can be a positive move. Hey, there were worse options out there, right? And while he had a -5 on the 2006-07 Sabres, his +/- was better in 05-06 than Chris Drury’s on the same team.
But now, the real rivalry begins. Who will wear #21, Kotalik or Chris Higgins?
|
|
Tags: 
