|
|
||||
|
Tonight, ESPN aired Kings Ransom, the first part of their “30 For 30″ documentary series. As someone who loves documentaries and worships Wayne Gretzky, I was really excited about this, even though Puck Daddy didn’t exactly gush over it. Thankfully, Kings Ransom wasn’t what I was afraid it’d be and, in many ways, it exceeded my expectations.
Like I said, I tend to obsess over the Great One, so the story isn’t exactly new to me. It isn’t new to many people, either; just last year, the NHL Network did their own documentary about the trade. Kings Ransom covers similar ground, but in a different way. By including a great deal of footage from the events leading up to the trade, we get an almost voyeuristic view of Gretzky’s life at that time. We’ve all seen clips of Gretzky breaking down at his press conference in Edmonton, but seeing his whole speech is a bit jarring. The same can be said for the footage of his limousine just after his marriage to Janet Jones. Through these clips, we see the human side of Wayne Gretzky, which is welcome, as these 21 years have taken away some of the emotion of the moment.
So much has been said about this trade that we almost forget that this was probably the biggest trade in sports history. Director Peter Berg tries to remind us of this fact by demonstrating how big hockey is in Edmonton and how special Gretzky’s time with the Oilers truly was. Kings Ransom doesn’t make much of an attempt to absolve Peter Pocklington of the blame for the trade, nor should it, especially since Glen Sather, Janet Jones, Bruce McNall and Jim Matheson all point their fingers at Pocklington. What’s interesting is, Gretzky is the only person to defend Pocklington.
Puck Daddy’s review criticized Gretzky for appearing unemotional about the trade in Kings Ransom, but the reason Gretzky is so composed is that he’s discussed this trade a million times. He can’t pretend to be as angry about it as, say, Sather was, simply because Sather has had less of a chance to vent in front of a camera. Gretzky has told his side of the story in his own autobiography and Ed Willes’ Gretzky to Lemieux. By chance, I’ve read both over the past two weeks. The story doesn’t change, but time (and constant discussion of the deal) has changed Gretzky’s mindset. Gretzky’s autobiography, written in 1990, reflects a bitter look at the trade. Today, Gretzky can calmly state that he understands why he was traded. That’s great for avoiding trouble, but as Puck Daddy states, it takes away from the documentary.
That Kings Ransom barely touches on the successes of the Kings and Oilers is refreshing, as the impact of this trade had nothing to do with anything that happened on the ice. It would have been nice to hear about the 1989 Kings-Oilers playoff series, but I was glad that Kings Ransom was about the trade and not the 1993 Kings. Also, it was nice to show the real aftermath of what happened – while it was true that Pocklington sold Gretzky to raise cash, it is also stated that Bruce McNall bought Gretzky with dirty money.
Kings Ransom really excelled in the subtle areas. The montage of Gretzky highlights at the beginning of the documentary wasn’t just any random highlights thrown together. Instead, they told the story of Gretzky’s time in Edmonton. Among the goals shown were Gretzky’s 50th goal in 39 games, Gretzky’s goal to beat Mike Vernon in Game 2 of the 1988 Smythe Division final, Gretzky’s 500th goal, and Gretzky’s goal to open Game 5 of the 1984 Stanley Cup final. Berg showed his fandom and true understanding of Gretzky’s career in this sequence. And I’d be remiss if I didn’t tip my cap to ESPN for their handling of this documentary. We do more than our fair share of ESPN bashing in these parts, but they nailed this one. They kept the commercials to an absolute minimum and didn’t run a score ticker at the bottom of the screen, even as the AL Central one-game playoff reached extra innings. Best of all, they didn’t look down on hockey the way many of us accuse them of doing. Instead, they let Peter Berg tell his story. More than that, they chose Wayne Gretzky and the National Hockey League lead this much-hyped series of documentaries. That says something.
While Kings Ransom isn’t a perfect documentary – in no small part because this is a story that we’re all familiar with – it does succeed in presenting a familiar story in a different light. It’s nice to see a hockey story on ESPN, in high definition, with a famous director using cutting-edge ideas and technology. The documentary does a great job of showing the conflicted nature of all parties involved with the trade; while all express regret on some level about the trade, all admit that the trade was for the best. Berg seems to agree, ending his documentary on the note that three NHL teams call California home. Though that’s not all Gretzky’s doing, Kings Ransom does an effective job of showing the trade’s influence on the NHL and sports in general.
I woke up in a cold sweat this morning around 4:30am. I think I sub-consciously realized something. If Eli Manning misses any kind of time, the Giants are absolutely screwed. I know that you are thinking that’s obvious, but I’m not so sure that it was always the case. Last year, the Giants featured one of the best running games in the history of the modern NFL. To quote some I know, The Giants ran a west coast offense. There running game was a short passing game. This year, it hasn’t been nearly as efficient. Brandon Jacobs has looked better as the early part of the season has worn on, but his yards per carry is down from 5.0 to 3.6. That’s quite a significant drop. Ahmad Bradshaw has done a good job picking up the slack, but he is a runner that is as consistent as Jacobs, or even as the man he replaced Derrick Ward. As hard as Bradshaw runs, he profiles as the kind of runner that is going to break some big runs that will raise his average, but also struggled to move the pile sometimes. When you put it all together, you are looking at a running that isn’t even close to what is was last year. The receiving corps of the Giants has been a subject of so much discussion that I’m sure everyone is just sick of hearing about it. However, it’s an important part of my theory. While Steve Smith is playing at a pro bowl level, how much of that is his chemistry with Manning? If David Carr comes into the game, who says that he doesn’t look more towards the second team guys that he works with every day in practice like Hakeem Nicks and Domenik Hixon. Who says that it doesn’t take weeks for them to get on the same page? Suddenly, one of your best weapons on offense is nullified. As for the defense, something is wrong. It’s not the injuries. It’s not the play calling. I don’t know what it is. Ever heard of the Blink Instinct? It’s a Malcolm Gladwell concept. The example of it that Gladwell gives in book Blink is a piece of art that a museum buys. Art scholars agree that it’s real. However, they get people that are from where the piece originated and they unanimously agree that the piece is fake. They can’t tell you why, but they know that it’s fake. Guess what? The piece is fake. That’s the way that I feel about the Giants defense. I can’t tell you what’s wrong, but something is. I’ve watched this team run the same defense for the last three years, and this version is just inferior right now. I am very afraid of the game against the Saints in two weeks. It’s not that I don’t have faith in David Carr. He wasn’t the number one pick of the 2002 draft for no reason. He has talent. The last two years with the Giants seemed to have normalized his career after the beating he took in Houston. In actuality, I was really surprised that he wasn’t picked up by another quarterback-poor team in this quarterback-poor league and given a shot to start. However, with the supporting cast playing at a much lower level than they did last season, more of the load has fallen on Manning’s shoulders. Could Carr hold it up? I’m not so sure. It’s generally assumed that Eli won’t miss any time, but Plantar Fascitis is a weird injury. It’s held basketball players out for months at a time. It kept Michael Strahan out for seven games in 2006. If the Giants wind up with Eli missing any time whatsoever, they might fight themselves on the outside looking in during the playoffs. Wow. Can’t beleive I just wrote that title. I’ve never felt like PFT’s Mike Florio more than I do right now. (Not a dig. I think the dude is brilliant.) Anyway, ESPN the Magazine has created an issue to combat the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue. Well, it’s not exactly the same in the way that they are dudes in it too. Let me explain. They call it “The Body Issue” and it’s supposed to focus on certain body parts of each athlete they put in. For example, 46-year old MMA legend Randy Couture is in the issue, and it’s expect to focus on his famous cauliflower ear. Shockingly, they chose to put the hottest women’s fighter in the world on the cover instead. That was sarcasm. Could you tell?
First of all, she is freaking hot. Second of all, Gina does not have abs like that under any circumstance. This is someone who routinely has problems making weight for fights, so excuse me if I can’t help but feel like there might be a little bit of airbrushing going on. Third of all, she’s freaking hot. Thanks to Cagewriter for the picture. |
||||
|
Copyright © 2010 The 3rd String Safety - All Rights Reserved |
||||